Skip to content
Red Zone Rank
Connect your leagueFree email alerts

Week 5 Wide Receiver Rankings & Results — Standard

Jaxon Smith-Njigba is our WR1 for Week 5 in Standard, ahead of CeeDee Lamb and Zay Flowers. The biggest riser since the last publish is Jaylin Noel (WR48→WR45); the biggest faller is Stefon Diggs (WR18→WR46).

Results table

Week 5 WR · Standard · Proj = engine median · Range = 20th–80th percentile · Opp/Total from the market as of 4:05 AM ET · Actual from final stats · Finish = actual rank on this board · Δ = actual − proj · Hit = within 6 ranks or inside the range · bye-week teams (CAR, KC) excluded
RankPlayerTeamOppProjRangeActualFinishΔHitNote
Tier 1 · Must start
1Jaxon Smith-Njigba
SEA vs SF
SEAvs SF11.217.8WR7+6.6HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs SF · 20–80 range 4.9–20.0.
2CeeDee Lamb
DAL vs TB · locked
DALvs TB (Thu)10.90.9WR38-10.0MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs TB · 20–80 range 4.9–19.5.
3Zay Flowers
BAL @ ATL · Questionable
BAL@ ATL10.26.6WR19-3.6HitQuestionable (game-day report, seen Sat 16:30 ET): P(active) 81% — median 10.2 if he plays.
4Puka Nacua
LA vs BUF
LAvs BUF (Mon)10.120.7WR3+10.6HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs BUF · 20–80 range 4.7–18.2.
5Chris Olave
NO vs MIN
NOvs MIN9.54.6WR27-4.9HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs MIN · 20–80 range 4.5–17.7.
6Nico Collins
HOU @ TEN
HOU@ TEN9.45.6WR23-3.8HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ TEN · 20–80 range 3.8–17.1.
7Amon-Ra St. Brown
DET @ ARI
DET@ ARI9.06.9WR17-2.1HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ ARI · 20–80 range 3.6–16.5.
8Tee Higgins
CIN @ MIA · Questionable
CIN@ MIA8.42.2WR34-6.2MissQuestionable (game-day report, seen Sat 16:30 ET): P(active) 97% — median 8.4 if he plays.
9Michael Wilson
ARI vs DET
ARIvs DET7.73.3WR30-4.4MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs DET · 20–80 range 3.5–14.5.
10Christian Watson
GB vs CHI
GBvs CHI7.626.3WR1+18.7MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs CHI · 20–80 range 3.2–14.6.
11Davante Adams
LA vs BUF
LAvs BUF (Mon)7.517.1WR8+9.6HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs BUF · 20–80 range 3.3–14.8.
12Drake London
ATL vs BAL
ATLvs BAL7.411.8WR13+4.4HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs BAL · 20–80 range 3.6–14.2.
Tier 2 · Start
13Ja'Marr Chase
CIN @ MIA · Questionable
CIN@ MIA6.213.7WR12+7.5HitQuestionable (game-day report, seen Sat 16:30 ET): P(active) 79% — median 6.2 if he plays.
14Carnell Tate
TEN vs HOU · Questionable
TENvs HOU5.90.6WR39-5.3MissQuestionable (game-day report, seen Sat 16:30 ET): P(active) 81% — median 5.9 if he plays.
15Garrett Wilson
NYJ vs CLE
NYJvs CLE5.816.4WR10+10.6HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs CLE · 20–80 range 2.1–12.4.
16Denzel Boston
CLE @ NYJ
CLE@ NYJ5.610.6WR14+5.0HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ NYJ · 20–80 range 2.2–12.4.
17Luther Burden III
CHI @ GB
CHI@ GB5.54.9WR25-0.6HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ GB · 20–80 range 2.2–12.0.
18Parker Washington
JAX vs PHI
JAXvs PHI5.324.4WR2+19.1MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs PHI · 20–80 range 2.1–11.7.
19Romeo Doubs
NE vs LV
NEvs LV5.31.6WR36-3.7MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs LV · 20–80 range 1.9–11.9.
20Deebo Samuel Sr.
SF @ SEA
SF@ SEA5.10.5WR40-4.6MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ SEA · 20–80 range 1.9–11.2.
21DK Metcalf
PIT vs IND
PITvs IND5.12.3WR33-2.8HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs IND · 20–80 range 2.0–11.3.
22Matthew Golden
GB vs CHI
GBvs CHI4.814.3WR11+9.5MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs CHI · 20–80 range 1.9–11.0.
23Malik Nabers
NYG @ WAS
NYG@ WAS4.718.1WR6+13.4MissEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; @ WAS · 20–80 range 1.9–10.8.
24Devaughn Vele
NO vs MIN
NOvs MIN4.62.6WR32-2.0HitEnsemble: recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency and opponent blended by fitted weights; vs MIN · 20–80 range 1.8–10.7.
Showing 24 of 48 · tiers 2+ below

What the numbers say

6.4mean abs. error · Standard points, top 36 · Week 4: 5.5
0.21rank correlation · Spearman, top 36
4 / 12ranked top 12 who finished top 12
47%actuals inside the 20–80 range · target 60%
This version was published after the week's first kickoff, so it is scored as a retrospective, not a forecast.
The engine's read on Week 5
Engine byline · no human author · Week 4 WR accuracy: MAE 5.5, top-12 hit 4/12

Engine-generated board: four projection sources (recency, season rate, opportunity × efficiency, opponent) blended by weights fitted on the forecast ledger, scored through 10,000 fitted-distribution outcomes under this format. No analyst has reviewed it yet.

Common questions about Week 5 WR rankings

Who is the best wide receiver to start in Week 5 Standard?

Jaxon Smith-Njigba, our WR1 with a 11.2-point median; CeeDee Lamb is WR2.

When do these rankings update?

Published Tuesday, refreshed Thursday and Saturday mornings, and again Sunday at 8 AM ET; inactives are polled from 90 minutes before each kickoff.

How this board is built
Projectionsens-fit-2026w04-mkt-2026-w5-2026-10-06+mkt-2026-w05-2026-10-06-09
Market2026-w05-2026-10-13-08
Simulation10,000 outcomes per player
Week 4 WR accuracyMAE 5.5 · top-12 hit 4/12
Rankings versionv2 · Sun, Oct 11, 8:03 AM ET
Ranks tagsunday-2026-w5-0803
Projection sources are blended by weights fitted on the forecast ledger; ranges come from simulated outcomes with injury status priced in. Every number on this page is the engine's. Data credits
VersionsRankings v4d5ad6bc· projections ens-fit-2026w04-mkt-2026-w5-2026-10-06+mkt-2026-w05-2026-10-06-09· lines 2026-w05-2026-10-13-08· injuries 2026-10-11T15:35:27Z· engine build aabb2e5· Report a problem with this version